Has anyone ever considered trying to invest money and effort into charity with the expectation that it will only benefit the situation generations ahead? Is that what some charity is already? Most? None?
One of my friends spent his evening yesterday packing boxes of supplies for the poorer parts of Africa and Asia, goodwill kinds of things destined for those who literally have the least, and I count that as a noble effort without any sarcasm or reservation. But it has occurred to me in the past, and again when he told me about it, that while I do routinely donate a fair amount of money each year to charitable organizations, they tend to help people closer to home with different sets of problems. I think I’ve specified them before, but let’s restate just for the sake of understanding my context.
Help Our Military Endure (HOME): supporting deployed troops in combat zones: http://helpourmilitaryendure.org/
Ben Sullivan Memorial Fund: supporting mental health research and the ability to talk about depression and anxiety: https://gkccfonlinedonations.org/sullivan/sullivan.asp
Ascanius Institute: promoting classics education for elementary school students and others: http://www.ascaniusyci.org/
Traditionally, these three constituted the bulk of my giving, mostly because I believe in those causes and because I know the people running the organizations. Recently, it’s grown to four with the addition of FIRST robotics (https://www.firstinspires.org/robotics/frc) and advancing STEM education, especially for disadvantaged and underrepresented populations.
And that summarizes my idea of what’s important, and what I think I can make a direct material contribution to in my life. Supporting the troops that keep America safe; keeping my friends and family (and strangers) safe from themselves when they want to hurt themselves in the worst of ways; and making education available to children, when it can matter most to their life and paths.
…. and it’s all here. For American citizens, many of them living right down the street from me.
This is where the annoying parts of my brain kick in and begin asking really unnecessary questions, like “why worry about people who already have enough to eat when other people don’t have that?” or “if you really cared, wouldn’t you give to a wider range of charities than just these?” These are toxic questions that I try to avoid or rationalize, and I think I can reasonably say that I’m doing a good thing. There are causes I have, that I value for my own personal reasons, and I am supporting them to a level appropriate to their importance and my ability to give.
I don’t want to get into the actual theory of trickle-down economics, because I have no idea how it’s supposed to work except in the broadest of terms, and I have no education or direct experience in how it has evolved over time. I also don’t want to ignite a political debate for it. But the point I’m starting to feel is that I feel like aside from HOME, my charities seem targeted to building a sustainable, educated population. Building education and opportunities for students of all backgrounds results in a broader civil culture in the country, better equipped to participate in political elections and discourse, better able to support the intellectual prowess (and especially STEM competitiveness) in the global arena, and a population that can help itself and help others. I want to make it so that more people will feel like I do: that people are most important of all things around us, that we can help each other.
There may be a part of me that thinks that, by donating to supporting the youth of America, we can be better prepared as a nation to help other places in the world… in a number of years. We have the wealth and basic technology to help all the slums and disaster areas of the world right now, if we had the desire and political willpower to do so. But in thirty years, I hope that some of the kids I work with now will be the ones to institute the political willpower and national drive to actually execute the actions we have the capability for now, and that they will be able to lead technological shifts that allow us to reliably avoid some natural disasters, and the global apocalypse that could be coming from ecological or economic or astronomical sources.
So. Is it better for me to try to invest in the long-term future of the country with the idea that we’ll be better prepared to solve the larger problems in the long run, or should I provide help to those who need it at this moment? Or both? Is one “better” than the other?
I hate those questions, and it might be because I think there’s a poor assumption made that one kind of help is inherently better than the other, when really both should be lauded.
So here’s my conclusion for the day: at least I’m doing something. Something is better than nothing, when it comes to well-directed, well-organized, thought-out help. And I will give the standard Thanksgiving encouragement that you’ll hear from other people and sources through the rest of the year, just like every year: reflect on what you have and what makes life good for you, and consider the problems you see around you. What can you do to help, even just a little bit? It doesn’t matter so much to me if it’s the immediate problem right in front of you, or if it’s the long term fixes to the catastrophes lurking in the wings. Just remember the CPR maxim: “adequate care provided is better than perfect care withheld”
Thanks for thinking about it. Thank you more for doing something about it.
——————–
Bob Award for Best Coding Aid, At Home And On The Job: Taylor Swift
What the fuck, Tay Tay. I honestly like your music, and I think you’ve got some good writing skillz and some wonderful pipes. But “Ready For It” has proven to be a wonderful song to put on and ignore while I code computer programs at work. I don’t get it. The basic development of a concept that netted me my first published work (paraphrased: “how to dodge space junk without really trying”) consisted of two days straight listening to “22“, and now I’m watching you turn into some kind of N7 Fury or other biological-augmented adept or sentinel or something and frankly it’s just distracting while I try to silence space computers from complaining when they get cold or lonely or whatever. What is it about you that brings out my technical side? Might be the clothes. Let’s keep working on that line of thinking.
… though, come to think of it, a lot of your songs bring me back to high school in different ways, none of them real (because I don’t think I’d ever heard of you until well after I’d moved back to Maryland, so in the 2012 timeframe). But that’s another post. Just keep doing what you do; I bought “reputation” so we’ll see if that can carry me through the next few school projects and finish the year strong for Fermi. If you come to town, Ms. Swift, I will happily buy you a drink to thank you for your (material, albeit peripheral) contributions to the technological success of the American Space Program, and we can discuss some of my other projects and how you might be able to contribute. I’m working on this fantastic thesis…